Educational Programs

Ames Plantation is home to many educational programs in forestry and wildlife biology. People come singly or in groups that range from high school students to teachers to forestry and wildlife students to professional foresters and wildlife biologists. People come here from all over the world. Students or technicians who come to Ames often stay for extended periods. It is not unusual for students to be in residence at Ames for several days, and often they stay for weeks or months as long as a year. Technicians, working on specific projects, may be in residence for several years. Ames has two small “dormitories,” that are located in houses, one for men and another for women.  And, it is not unusual for Ames personnel to travel to other places to conduct educational activities.

Programs
University of Tennessee veterinarian students spend 1 week at Ames learning about livestock. These student groups come here 4 times per year. Each group receives an overview of all forestry and wildlife research and management efforts ongoing at Ames. Having the chance to see wildlife research is valuable to students who will make their living working with animals and, because they will be expected by the public to know about animals, must often comment on issues involving wildlife.

During the early part of the year the Director of the Ames Forestry and Wildlife program was invited to speak at local Rotary and Chamber of Commerce clubs. It is a way to keep the community abreast of events and these groups are enthusiastic to learn about what is going on at Ames.

Several times during the first half of the year, Ames personnel had the chance to visit the Larry Rea radio show on to discuss various programs that are ongoing at Ames.

The Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference was held in Memphis from February 28 – March 3, 2005. This meeting is one of the most prestigious forestry meetings in the Nation and is held every-other year. Scientists, professions and students come from all over the South and also Nationally to attend the weeklong Conference where research findings are presented. Nearly 400 people attended the Conference. This year the group elected to visit Ames to observe the research efforts. A field tour, which was limited to 50 people, was quickly filled. This number represented one of the largest field tours ever conducted in the history of the Conference. The group visited Ames on March 3, for an all day tour of forestry and wildlife research.

The University of Tennessee Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries conducted inservice training for Extension personnel on March 8-9. Agents spent time learning about forestry and wildlife issues and also to gain the knowledge needed to train young 4-H students so that they could successfully compete in forestry and wildlife judging events.

A group of students attending a Wetlands Ecology and Management course spent a day at Ames on March 15. The students were enrolled at the University of Tennessee and came from the Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries. The group was able to observe a number of eco-systems and also to visit with the Ames Director of Forestry and Wildlife.

The Ames Forestry and Wildlife scientist attended the Tennessee Wildlife Society Meeting on March 17 to deliver an update on the Quail management Program at Ames. Statewide wildlife professionals and students attend the meeting.

The Director of Forestry and Wildlife was able to attend the Memphis Lumberman’s Education Foundation meeting on April 14, where an overview of the Teacher’s Conservation Workshop was given. The Foundation is an offshoot of the Lumberman’s Club of Memphis and is dedicated to providing sound information about forests and forestry to the general public. One of the programs that they support is the Teacher’s Conservation Workshop held partially on Ames every year.

The Director of Forestry and Wildlife attended the Mississippi Teachers Conference on May 24 to deliver lectures and field tours. About 50 teachers attended the conference.

On May 8-9, a group of students and Professors from the Kasetsart University, Thailand were in residence at Ames. The group was able to see forestry and wildlife projects along with an overview of the entire Ames Program. The Thai group has been coming to Ames for several years and each year different students and professors are involved. In 1995 the Ames Director of Forestry and Wildlife was able to visit Thailand for 21 days hosted by faculty at the Kasetsart University.

From June 5 through the 10th, fifteen young people, ranging in age from 10 to 16, were in residence at Ames. This was part of an annual camp sponsored by Quail Unlimited. During the course of the week these youngsters were able to complete hunter safety, learned how to safely paddle a canoe on a river, how to shoot clay targets, photography and a long list of things that relate to wildlife management. Of course, being on the grounds of the National Championship for all-age bird dogs, they were able to learn a great deal about quail biology and management. They also spent time learning about quail telemetry.

Union University students attended Ames on June 11, for tours on forestry and wildlife.

Teachers’ Conservation Workshop
The Ames portion of the Tennessee Teachers Conservation workshop was conducted July 11 –12. Teachers from the western end of the state attend the weeklong workshop to learn about forestry and wildlife. The Tennessee Forestry Association and the Lumberman’s Education Foundation have sponsored the event. It is also supported by a wide range of public and industrial personnel and is dedicated to teaching sound forestry and ecological science to teachers. They also have a great deal of fun during the week, visiting areas where they can rock hunt learning how to make paper and a host of other activities. From this week’s experience they can pick up an array of things that will be valuable application in their classrooms. Although a very similar workshop has been ongoing for a number of years in Mississippi, the original impetus for the Tennessee program was derived from the Woods Walk – Woods Talk program that was supported at Ames for about 20 years. Getting the program organized is largely credited to Mr. Gerry Reynolds of the Memphis Hardwood Foundation. It was his vision to present sound forestry by letting people observe good management and healthy forests that made the program a reality.

The old Woods Walk – Woods Talk program was presented at the Annual Meeting of Society of Wood and Science Technology, June 24-28, 2001, Baltimore Md. It was an invited talk. Below are excerpts from that presentation.

WOODS WALK - WOODS TALK
by:
Allan E. Houston
An excerpt from an invited talk
at the Society of Wood and Science Technology,
June 24-28, 2001, Baltimore Md.

A Day in the Woods

"Woods Walk - Woods Talk" was designed to teach teachers. From the beginning there were two major goals in mind. First, attendees receive a better understanding of the dynamic nature of biological communities, both across the landscape and across time. Second, the day provides some concept of the values that attend a forested landscape and provides the audience with a rudimentary ability to measure basic monetary values such as boardfoot volumes, along with wildlife and aesthetic components.

Armed with this information the audience leaves the woods better able to evaluate modern-day natural resource debates. At the very least, when ecological issues are portrayed in typically much-to-simple terms, they may be better prepared to discuss the questions with greater depth and a better sense of balance.

We begin the day with an indoor lecture that gives students a tour of time and an impression of how landscapes change. We visit a 19th century homestead, to renew our understanding of how the land contributes to men’s lives. From there we travel to an outdoor Museum –a Natural Area-- and discuss how a forest is born, dies and is born anew. We visit a forest that stands on the poor ground where men once grew cotton; and we see a majestic bottomland forest where priorities vie in a spectrum of values. And, then we look at young growth.

“Woods Walk - Woods Talk” was born out of a vision that the target group would multiply the educational input; and from this foundation the program had proven durable and has evolved into something better.

A Homemade Recipe for Field Presentations - Twenty Years of Ingredients
To be effective, an educational effort must be delivered to a receptive audience in an attractive manner. It is a question of targeting a specific group; packaging information so that it isn’t too big or small and then evaluating the resources available to effectively convey the information.

“Targeting the group” - Many programs are, by nature, broad based. Their appeal reaches across an array of age groups and disciplines. Other programs however, would do well to target a specific group, honing an ability to fit the needs of that group. For example, a program developed to educate college students would not be fitting for third grade school children. Also, programs that do well in the long run mature over time. A core of expertise builds within the material; and from that base the best programs achieve the flexibility to include new ideas and issues as they come along.

For a nontrained-educator in the public realm, like myself, zeroing in on a target group helps reduce the frustration inherent in trying to build a program. There are enough bureaucratic limbs obstructing information shot toward any target, without trying to be all things to all people. Once the target group is defined, it is vital that the message be built with that audience in mind. One must not only consider what is desirous for them to hear, but also what they must first understand before they can comprehend the message --and how much can they carry in the time frame allowed?

“Packaging information” - In general, information is conveyed in three broad mediums:
- a classical educational experience, most likely thought of as a classroom setting;
- a hands-on experience, where students build something, or perhaps a field trip with the student in a close-up, but observational role;
- fun, where the students participate in an entertaining or exciting experience that is educational and perhaps team building, or even ancillary to the main process, but allows students to relax and better engage in the total program.

This trioka may be developed very fully over a week-long workshop. It can even be developed in a half-day lecture with slides to simulate a field trip and thoughtfully injected humor to keep sleepy heads from thumping desktops. Depending on the audience, one leg of this triangle will need to be longer than another. With younger students, obviously a premium should be placed on the “fun” and “experience” portions, as opposed to the droning of a classroom.

There is always a temptation to tell the audience more than they need, or care to hear–to make the subject more complex than it needs to be. Many issues raised in one-day natural resource workshops are the subject of 4-year degrees. Any horse rode into the ground usually takes a saddle-sore, and downright angry, audience along for the ride.
Packing information is an exercise in organization. It must flow logically and attractively. It is better to overly inform than to utterly confuse. But, information must not bog down in tedium. Teaching resources can be used like stepping stones to the goal of understanding. However, it is vital that both “package” and methods be identified a priori so as to be delivered in a cogent, thematic and logical manner.

The educator must be prepared and know the material. He must like his audience and by extension respect contrary points of view as being held by respectable folk. She must identify a theme and critically assess the means to achieve its full composition.

“Evaluating resources” - Resources come in many forms, including the dynamism and expertise of individual speakers, the availability of take-home products, proximity of land resources, monetary support and administrative blessing, and the long term fidelity of audience pool. Resources must be evaluated for effectiveness rather than incorporated for convenience. To wit, a long bus ride to a good field site may not be worth the view, unless the audience is highly technical and badly needs to see some hard-to-find, specialized gadgetry. A fine speaker can be sabotaged by poor presentation mediums or staging. On the other hand a mediocre speaker can be riveting with outstanding props and a love of what she is about.

A Vision tied to Reality
All three of these concepts were vital to the success of the “Woods Walk -Woods Talk” program, although all three are more a virtue of hindsight and in some cases simple good luck. Yet, there was a sense that teachingteachers was worth the effort, that this was a program with a “multiplier effect.” This formed a “vision” that was a tremendous incentive. There is no fire that doesn’t need a few banking coals over the long haul.

The “Woods Walk - Woods Talk” target was large and there were novel ways to gain access to them, including in-service days. And the audience provided a stimulating synapse. These are smart people. They wanted to know things and sometimes they initiated contact and set up a day in the woods.

The information package was evaluated very critically. As new issues came to light they were incorporated, but the foundational biological precepts remained. In essence, it is to this day a set of very orderly steps that the students accomplish during the course of the program. It brings the students onto a common page and moves them into a common realization that allows them to evaluate and quantify natural resource questions in a new light. Building from foundational ideas, the day moves from one teaching tool to the next. An array of resources allow illustration of specific concepts through an escalating alphabet of understanding. It was good luck to have so many pertinent natural resource settings, so quickly available, at Ames Plantation.